Timeline for camera flashing in film
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 14, 2015 at 15:20 | answer | added | TafT | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 16, 2015 at 0:29 | comment | added | stib | AFAIK the blackmagic Ursa shoots global shutter. | |
Apr 14, 2015 at 2:46 | comment | added | Peter Cordes | If you really want to shoot content with strobe/flash lighting happening, there might still be cameras made that don't use a rolling shutter. IDK, and that doesn't help fix the video already recorded. | |
Apr 14, 2015 at 2:32 | comment | added | Alex | @PeterCordes yea the c100 mk i shoots interlaced 60/50i, everything else is progressive. its a pain in the ass, but not worth upgrading to the mk ii for. but yea rolling shutter is indeed it, I kept searching after I posted this. It seems like theres not much one can do | |
Apr 11, 2015 at 13:44 | comment | added | Peter Cordes | also: They make cameras that only shoot interlaced? Yuck. I'd take lower rez progressive at double frame rate any day. (e.g. 720p60). | |
Apr 11, 2015 at 13:39 | comment | added | Peter Cordes | I think you're talking about the "rolling shutter" issue, where each frame isn't a snapshot of a single point in time. Rather, each line is from a different moment, or something like that. A flash going off will then lead to tearing, like you'd get in a game with vsync off. | |
Apr 9, 2015 at 20:32 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAVP/status/586265439363342339 | ||
Apr 8, 2015 at 6:26 | comment | added | stib | is it the horizontal lines you're talking about? That looks like the exposure changed during the scan. changing shutter speed might help. | |
Apr 4, 2015 at 20:57 | review | First posts | |||
May 4, 2015 at 20:59 | |||||
Apr 4, 2015 at 20:54 | history | asked | Alex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |