Hot answers tagged

4

Adobe licenses its H.264 encoder from Mainconcept, which doesn't do that well at low bitrates. x264 is pretty much the frontier when it comes at low size output for a given quality target, or quality for a given bitrate target. x264 is what's used by platforms like Youtube / Vimeo ..etc to encode user videos. One thing you could try is to increase the ...


3

it looks like the Video is encoded in 4000 kbit/s, instead of a Rate Factor (RF). But that isn't the issue here. The issue is: while 264 does support lossless encoding, it not widely compatible! (you would do this by setting the color format to hi444 and -cq 0 (Thanks to Gyan for pointing this out) If you want the best quality, but also the largest file, you ...


2

I avoid AME and use x264 via ffmpeg for H.264 encoding. From Premiere I prefer to output a temporary lossless compressed format as the intermediate, such as the free and open-source Ut video, instead of DNxHD/DNxHR/ProRes. This avoids any generation loss (minor as it may be with ProRes/DNxHD, but still technically present as they are not lossless). Also, I'm ...


2

A one frame H264 stream would have to consist of an intra-coded frame, so there is a size floor in effect. This ffmpeg command produces a 1.7 kiB file ffmpeg -f lavfi -i color=blue:s=1280x720 -vframes 1 out.mp4 You can save ~200 bytes by lowering the resolution.


1

I was able to find an answer. https://stackoverflow.com/a/14308561/941493. In the nutshell, CRF calculation is also affected by preset so the same CRF number is not the same with different presets. Based on some developer difference can be mostly ignored.


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible