Equipment for making closeup object videos. I want to do a video like this:

Would my Galaxy s22 Ultra take such a close-up video? Also what Bluetooth microphone would you recommend?

2 Answers 2


I would very much doubt you'll do this with a phone.

Macro photography is not easy; macro videography is harder still; videography with a zoom lens is not only hard, but expensive.

Let's run through what you need…

  1. A tripod. You cannot shoot macro hand-held unless you have an extremely steady hand. No-one has a steady-enough hand to shoot macro video. It might be possible with a good gimbal - not something I've ever tried.

  2. A lot of light. It just comes with the territory, you're asking for the amount of light from a tiny object to be sufficient to get a decent exposure - you're going to have to add light to do this. More light still if you're shooting high frame-rate for slo-mo. [The picture of the bud further down took two kino-type flat panels for the subject & 2 strobes for the background - that's all the more reason your example video didn't attempt to light a background too.]

  3. A macro lens or a very long telephoto. True macro lenses can not only focus from very close, but they also have a high magnification factor; they can bring the object 1:1 on a full frame camera.
    A long telephoto can do without the extreme closeup capability, but needs sufficient magnification to compensate. It's a trade-off.

Here's a very quick [& a bit blurry because I shot it hand held so focus drifted a little] picture of a lightning connector, done on a cheap macro-capable 300mm lens on a crop-frame stills camera [still a far larger sensor than a phone].

enter image description here
Click for larger size

As you can see, we're not close enough yet, even on a 300mm lens. This was minimum focus distance. Also note, if you view it larger, how noisy the image is - this is because I only had some weak sunlight diffused through voile curtains, so I had to ramp up the camera's ISO quite a long way to get exposure time down far enough to not have camera-shake. I also shot at f/11 which is this particular lens's optimum between depth of field & diffraction blur.
To get closer, on an interchangeable lens camera you either buy a 'proper' macro lens, or you put extensions between the body & lens. This shortens the close-focus point [& simultaneously prevents it from focussing to infinity.]
That can get you close enough.
Here's one I did earlier…

enter image description here

Now we're close enough. This entire bud is 2mm long. But this is not a single exposure, this is focus-stacked… something you cannot do on video.
I did a brief explanation of using extension tubes for macro here - https://photo.stackexchange.com/a/128915/57929

  1. The toughest one of all - the zoom at the head of the video's macro shots. This is partly faked in post, so I can't tell how much was really done with a zoom lens… but regular stills lenses change focus if you change zoom. This is a cost-cutting exercise, but stills cameras don't really need to be able to keep focus whilst zooming; it's an expensive luxury. You can get a good stills zoom for $£€ 1,500 - 3,000 depending on length.
    A good video zoom, however, with parfocal capability [focus does not change as you zoom] can be anywhere from maybe $£€20,000 - 50,000. Few people buy this stuff, they rent it.

By the time you'd bought that, you'll realise how cheap your lighting was, by comparison;)
The lighting for the bud was under $£€ 1,000.

Having said all that - you can get macro & telephoto adapters [diopters] for phones. They are by comparison dirt cheap - couple of hundred bucks.
You could always give it a go & let us know how you get on…

  • Diopters are a more affordable alternative to a macro lens. Feb 13, 2023 at 15:28
  • @MichaelLiebman - that's pretty much your only option on a phone; something that modifies the existing lens. tbh it didn't occur to me to mention them by name, I've added to the answer. I can't say I'm a fan of them on a decent lens; aberration, reflections...
    – Tetsujin
    Feb 13, 2023 at 17:16

You can't get that close, and it would be tricky to do it for video, but if your phone doesn't have a macro lens, a drop of water on the lens can serve as a makeshift macro lens:

(I wouldn't do this unless your phone is waterproof, and you'll need lots of light).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.