1

Hi, guys. I just watched the David Attenborough documentary: Life In The Undergrowth:
Invasion Of The Land.

And I was wondering: What sort of equipment would I need, in order to get that kind of footage? Is it possible with typical modern retail-consumer class A/V hardware; or only at great expense - with professional, specialized gear?

I've included a short clip to illustrate the actual size of some typical subjects; followed by a copy of the entire documentary for your viewing pleasure (if anybody's interested).

Unfortunately, they're both in SD/Lo-Res; but should (hopefully) give you a decent idea of what I'm talking about.

Here's a short clip on YouTube:
(min 144p→360p max)

Here's the full video on Dailymotion:
(min 380p→480p max)

Cheers.

| improve this question | |
  • 1
    This is a site frequented by video professionals, you're not going to win any friends by posting pirated content. I fixed it for you. – stib Jan 21 '17 at 22:42
2

Up until the high-frame rate (HFR) section of the video I would have said that all you need is a Canon MP-E 65mm Macro Lens, a nice LED light (so as not to fry the poor bugs with all the IR radiation that comes from tungsten halogen sources), and a camera with a reasonable video codec that accepts Canon lenses. However, the HFR section is clearly in the specialized territory of a Phantom camera, which is very expensive.

| improve this answer | |
  • Keep in mind that many recent cell phones can record 240 fps footage. Macro photography with a cell phone is tricky, but it can be done. – user1118321 Jan 22 '17 at 3:37
  • 240 fps is likely not fast enough to capture those high-speed sequences. I expect they were shot at 1000fps or above. – Michael Tiemann Jan 22 '17 at 16:22
  • Ah, good point! – user1118321 Jan 22 '17 at 16:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.