Timeline for How Important is the 180 Degree Shutter Angle Rule?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2022 at 8:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 19, 2021 at 7:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 22, 2021 at 7:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 22, 2021 at 5:41 | answer | added | Jason Conrad | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 20, 2021 at 23:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 20, 2021 at 22:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 23, 2020 at 22:03 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 27, 2020 at 20:06 | comment | added | Jason Conrad | You do what you have to do. If it's a bright, sunny day and you don't have an ND handy, sometimes you have to increase the shutter speed. It doesn't look great, but it looks better than being over exposed. I'll often increase the framerate to get faux-ND. DaVinci Resolve can use the extra frames, plus optical flow analysis to generate motion blur; it's not perfect, but it can help bring the image back towards where it would've been with an ND. | |
| Jun 25, 2020 at 21:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 26, 2020 at 20:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 29, 2019 at 19:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 29, 2019 at 18:11 | answer | added | Rafael | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 29, 2019 at 13:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 11, 2019 at 14:59 | comment | added | Michael | I seem to notice the difference between 24p and 30p on computer screens (maybe because of the 3:2 pulldown?), but never notice the 180 shutter angle unless there is a comparison. Given that my audience is not a bunch of video guys, I want to know if people actually notices the different. Anyways, I got a variable ND filter at the end - still faces issues occasionally though, especially when it is too bright (which calls for log which has ISO 800 to protect highlights). | |
| Jun 1, 2019 at 12:02 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| May 3, 2019 at 18:11 | comment | added | Rusty Core | It is a convention to create a broadly acceptable film look. You can break it, but your video will look different compared to the conventional look, and your viewers may not even realize what is wrong, but they will feel it... or not. I have friends who do not notice fake frames added by modern TVs into a 24fps movie, or conversely who are not distracted by stuttering racing car when a 60fps video is reduced to 30fps. So, it depends :) | |
| May 2, 2019 at 11:21 | answer | added | CyanideBaby | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 1, 2019 at 11:06 | history | asked | Michael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |