Timeline for CPU Selection for video encoding
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 18, 2019 at 14:43 | comment | added | Ray Foss | do your own testing... I have a quad core E3 v5 being 4 times faster than a quad code E5 v2 at x264 encoding. Ram isn't the reason as the DD3 is 1866 while the dd4 is 2100. I don't get it either. | |
Aug 30, 2017 at 17:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 31, 2017 at 16:58 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 1, 2017 at 16:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 1, 2017 at 15:08 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 2, 2017 at 14:25 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Apr 2, 2017 at 14:25 | answer | added | McFlySoHigh | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 31, 2017 at 22:31 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Mar 1, 2017 at 21:33 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jan 30, 2017 at 21:29 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 31, 2016 at 20:30 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Dec 1, 2016 at 20:26 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 1, 2016 at 19:30 | answer | added | Gyan | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 1, 2016 at 19:02 | history | edited | Alan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Nov 1, 2016 at 17:36 | comment | added | Alan | I had wondered about the disk I/O issue considering all these CPUs can't be on the same system. While yes it is an old version, the comparative numbers between CPUs seemed like it should be similar across all ffmpeg versions. | |
Nov 1, 2016 at 17:31 | comment | added | Gyan | a) That pts test is using an old version of ffmpeg b) it's encoding to DV, which is an intraframe codec. Not sure how much that taxes modern CPUs. It'll tax disk I/O a lot more. | |
Nov 1, 2016 at 16:17 | history | asked | Alan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |