Video Production Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts spanning the fields of video, and media creation. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

I'm confused about the relationship between focal length and shutter speed, and the relationship between shutter speed and FPS. Can somebody explain in more detail here? What I read is that shutter speed=1/(2*fps) at least, while shutter speed=1/focal length.

Edited If i have an ip camera of 640x480(sensor width =3.6mm), focal length from 5 to 50mm, need to record 30fps, what is the best shutter speed to be use?assuming that the object distance to camera is 60ft.

share|improve this question

migrated from Mar 15 '13 at 23:18

This question came from our site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers.

marked as duplicate by JoshP, Dr Mayhem, ObscureRobot, Saaru Lindestøkke, Friend Of George Mar 26 '13 at 3:08

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Are you doing stop motion, or video? – mattdm Mar 14 '13 at 13:57
I need to record a video with moving object. the object must not be blurred by motion blur. – user17752 Mar 14 '13 at 14:20

Shutter speed and focal length are completely independent parameters, focal length determines angle of view (how much scenery you get in your shot). Shutter speed determines how long each part of the image sensor is exposed for, and therefore it determines the brightness of the image, and how much blur is caused by moving objects.

The quantity that most commonly relates the two is camera shake. It is often advised that to avoid camera shake the shutter speed must be 1/focal-length. This is presumably where you've gotten this equivalence from. The rule is a guideline only and depends on your technique and degree of enlargement in the final image. A better guideline is shutter-speed = 3/focal-length

FPS, or frames per second is the number of images per second recorded by your camera. It is related to shutter speed in that shutter-speed + latency < 1/FPS. If each frame takes more than a 60th of a second to expose, then you are not going to be able to cram more than 60 exposures in a second! There is a nonzero amount of time required to recock the shutter mechanism (if necessary) and readout and store the image, which is the latency. In stills cameras not designed for continuous readout the latency can increase as buffers become full, causing the maximum obtainable FPS to drop.

The formula shutter speed = 1/(2*FPS) relates to a shutter angle of 180 degrees, which is a concept from film cine cameras whereby the film can only be exposed for a maximum of half the intra-frame time, because of the rotating shutter. This rule is still obeyed by digital filmmakers to ensure "cinema like" motion to the image, compared to if shutter speed = 1/FPS which gives more fluid "TV like" motion.

share|improve this answer
Updated my question. thanks for the explanation. – user17752 Mar 14 '13 at 12:42
Remember also that generally-speaking, the longer the focal length, the slower the lens and thus the slower your shutter needs to be. – fluffy Mar 17 '13 at 19:44