Video Production Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts spanning the fields of video, and media creation. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm doing some HTML5 video work; I'm taking uploaded video and using ffmpeg and related packages to convert the original videos (usually .mov, but whatever) into mp4, ogg and webm versions for presentation via video.js. The ogg and webm encodings are both working nicely in Firefox across Windows, Mac, and Linux (the main reason for producing both, it seems); my question is whether, as a practical matter, I need to produce both ogg and webm versions. Both seem to be working well; I'm asking out of an interest in not producing stuff that I don't really need. Any thoughts? Thanks!

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Probably better suited for Stackoverflow but I think its still a valid question for this SE.

Producing theora(ogg) versions of your videos is actually redundant. Any browser version supporting ogg is also supporting webm.

For questions like these I recommend using If you compare webm with ogg you quickly see that you cover the same browser versions and more with webm. Unless you need to cover Firefox 3.5+.

share|improve this answer
Thanks much -- I'm new to the ogg/webm stuff, but that's pretty much what I thought was going on. – Jim Miller Jul 28 '14 at 22:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.