Take the 2-minute tour ×
Video Production Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for engineers, producers, editors, and enthusiasts spanning the fields of video, and media creation. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I want to start two short film projects but I don't know what equipment I need to get a good professional quality result. I've been saving some money so I hope budget is not a problem. Also, what's most commonly used to record audio in this kind of project? I want to get the sound from two people talking with the camera placed far away from them. I'm trying to make an independent production company so I'm seeing this as an investment. The cheaper the better though.

share|improve this question
1  
Hello AlanK, and welcome to AVP. I'd just like to suggest adding to your question, with some more specifics. For example, saying "I hope budget is not a problem" and later "The cheaper the better, though" can be very misguiding. Also, budget gear is different to different people - DSLRs for some, but those working in film will tell you the C500 - at $19k, is a budget camera! –  nchpmn Jan 31 at 7:39
    
@nchpmn - that's more those in Hollywood. It is quite typical for DSLRs to be used in independent film and even some commercial productions, though the actual way those DSLRs are typically kitted does bring them up near the $19k range. There are cheaper options available though that meet the professional standards. You can build a high quality rig around BlackMagic's cameras for around the 10 grand range for the camera itself. Really hard to do anything truly considered professional for under 5 grand though since most professional lenses will run you 2 to 2 and a half grand alone. –  AJ Henderson Jan 31 at 15:24
    
Let alone cinema lenses that start around 20 grand. –  AJ Henderson Jan 31 at 15:28
    
@AJHenderson I asked for clarification because OP is asking for "professional quality", where "budget is not a problem". Hence, I'd recommend my 'daily' camera, the C100, as a starting point. –  nchpmn Feb 3 at 0:07
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

For videography, the best bang for your buck is, hands down, going to be an entry level DSLR and a decent lens. For audio, if your budget can allow for it, I suggest getting a stand alone multi-track recorder. The Zoom H4n is a particularly popular model with videographers for its low price and decent (though not superb) audio quality.

There are far better options and values as you get more skill in the field, however for starting out, you probably don't want to invest too much until you get some experience under your belt. It's easy to spend upwards of $10 to $15 grand on a nice videography setup as you get more and more professional, but a $1500-$1700 setup with something like a Canon T4i or Lumix G2 with a moderate level lens and an H4n or similar for recording audio (with some basic shotgun or lavaliere mics) is a decent start.

Also, be sure not to skimp on a tripod. You'll want a solid, sturdy tripod (probably aluminum) with a good fluid tripod head to make sure you can get steady shots. Just a solid tripod alone can run you in to the $350 to $500 range.

If you'll be shooting indoors, you may also need a light kit. A cheap 3 point lighting kit can be had for a couple hundred dollars, though depending on what you intend to shoot, you may be able to get by without this initially.

So overall breakdown I'd recommend starting out is around $500 to $600 on an entry level DSLR, $150 to $300 on a lens (if your DSLR body supports video auto focus, such as the Canon T4i, a stepper motor lens is needed), about $280 for an audio recorder, about $100 to $200 on mics, about $400 on a tripod and optionally about $150-$250 on lights. Altogether, that's about $1600 or $1850 and you should be able to make some pretty solid professional looking stuff.

It does add up quickly, but the good news is that you can improve on the gear incrementally over time once you have the basics. If you do have more than 2 grand to start out with, I'd spend a little bit extra on the lens or the camera body to get better low light performance and better background blur. Better mics or mic boom arms also couldn't hurt and if you do go with lights, light modifiers or more powerful lights is also never a bad investment, though the best place to spend any extra money is going to depend on the kind of shooting you are planning on doing.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks a bunch! Just one thing, I was checking out the camcorders and they aren't as expensive as i thought they were. What do you thing of those? Again, thank you very much, it's really helpful. –  AlanK Jan 29 at 19:26
    
@AlanK - what kind of camcorders do you mean? Your average consumer targeted camcorder in the sub $600 range is going to have a small sensor and a small lens and will likely have a fairly limited dynamic range. These all make them less than ideal for a professional quality end product. Things like nice background blurs would be near impossible and low light performance will be substandard compared to larger sensor DSLRs with faster lenses. –  AJ Henderson Jan 29 at 19:49
    
Oh, one other caveat to that sub-$600 statement. The GoPro is a major exception to that rule. It has a really great image sensor for the price, but it accomplishes that by sacrificing pretty much any kind of flexibility at all. It has a decent fixed lens, but no display (without an addon) and no ability to adjust from that one particular focal length. If it happens to be usable for what you need, it is a lot of camera for a low, low price, but it is very limited in what it can be used for. It also won't get background blur, but is much better than just about anything else in that space. –  AJ Henderson Jan 29 at 22:03
    
In defence of the Zoom H4n, and this is of course purely subjective, the audio quality is superb. It may not outperform a good shotgun mic in situation where you'll want to use a good shotgun mic, but as an all-round recording device, 'decent' is selling it short. –  Marcks Thomas Jan 29 at 22:12
    
@marcks for the price I agree, however as digital recorders in general go it is still very noisy. It is the best value around, but it is only decent quality. I say that as a very satisfied h4n owner. –  AJ Henderson Jan 29 at 22:44
show 1 more comment

Zoom H4n is a pretty good unit for audio

Clean up your recordings (if req'd) in Adobe Audition using the Noise Print feature and you can remove a lot of extraneous noise.

share|improve this answer
    
This is not really an answer to the question. They are asking what equipment do they need for starting out making a professional quality film. Just an audio recorder does not answer what equipment is needed (or answers it very, very poorly). –  AJ Henderson Jan 31 at 15:21
    
Thanks for your feedback. A discussion on equipment might include reference to useful applications and a recommendation on a particular piece of hardware; in this case the Zoom H4n and Adobe Audition. –  Alex_H Feb 12 at 23:49
    
True, and partial answers are ok, though with no further expansion as to why the H4n is a good choice this is still a rather low quality answer. If you could expand on it some, that would help it be more useful, particularly since the h4n had already been mentioned. Also, the noise print feature of Adobe Audition is more or less irrelevant to a question on equipment since it is software and a feature in software that would only be used if there were noise issues in the first place (which a professional quality project should seek to limit or eliminate to begin with.) –  AJ Henderson Feb 13 at 0:15
    
I only comment because I think with a little more effort it could be a more valuable answer to the question than it currently is. –  AJ Henderson Feb 13 at 0:16
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.